If you’re trying to keep on top of security concerns, the Technicolor – E31T2V1 has a slight edge over the Ubee – E31U2V1 since someone along the development chain decided to disable access to the spectrum analyzer. Our tester was provided with the Technicolor as standard equipment when he upgraded his internet speed. Intel’s modem chipset line has been plagued with issues ranging from packet loss to security vulnerabilities. Spectrum buys modems from at least three suppliers: The Technicolor – E31T2V1 and Ubee – E31U2V1 both use the Broadcom 3390 chipset, while the E31N2V1 model from Hitron uses the dreaded Intel PUMA 7 chipset. This modem supports the new DOCSIS 3.1 protocol on 32 channels, so it will be able to work at even faster speeds if Spectrum chooses to beef up their network infrastructure. This and the related modems provided by Spectrum are currently the only hardware that’s certified to work for the fastest “Gig” speed tier, up to 940 mbps. The Technicolor – E31T2V1 is one of the modems Spectrum provides to new subscribers getting Ultra (400 mbps) speeds or faster. But if you get one of the Intel-based modems instead and you notice problems with latency and jitter, we think the Netgear – C7000 modem-router combo or the modem-only Motorola – MB8600 are the two best offerings on the list of modems that Spectrum approves. We tested the new DOCSIS 3.1 modem they provided to us, the Technicolor – E31T2V1, and it’s a great modem running a reliable chipset that does exactly what it’s supposed to do. All these are great lines for either spinning or baitcasting reels.Our resident networking guru spent three weeks researching chipset versions, known bugs and security vulnerabilities, and trying to get a straight answer from Spectrum’s regional communications team about their policy toward customer-owned modems.
This data on fishing line diameters was compiled using the very popular Berkley Trilene and Berkley Big Game (in larger breaking strains) as the mono line, Berkley Vanish as the fluorocarbon line and Spiderwire Stealth as the braided line. See also: Our Top Fluorocarbon Lines Rated Final word on fishing line diameters It is also significantly more expensive than monofilament fishing lines across every line class. However, it is worth remembering fluorocarbon line is less supple and harder to tie good knots with. That gives a fluorocarbon leader a number of advantages over a monofilament leader in most circumstances. It is also more abrasion resistant and nearly invisible in the water. Once you get to 50lb and 60lb you can see that fluorocarbon line is a little thicker than mono of the same breaking strength. At a breaking strength of 12lb, mono was again 1/1000 of an inch thicker in terms of line diameter than fluoro of the same breaking strength. Our Favorite Monofilament Lines Reviewed Fluorocarbon line diameter chartįluorocarbon is a little stronger than mono for an equivalent diameter, except when you get to the highing breaking strain category where fluoro is actually thicker for a given strength test than mono as you can see from the table.įor example, at the 4 pound test mark, monofilament line had a diameter of 0.008in and fluorocarbon line 0.007in. Mono is great choice as an affordable running line that you can spool on your reel without breaking the bank compared to braid and fluoro. Monofilament tends to be slightly thicker in terms of line diameter than fluorocarbon for a given breaking strength and significantly thicker than braided lines, as mentioned above. Monofilament fishing lines: diameter chart Braid is also great to get a good hookset on bony or hard-mouthed fish as it has very little stretch compared to other fishing lines. When you get out to 20lb, the braided line is 0.010in and the mono/fluoro 0.016 in diameter – a difference of 38%.īraid is a popular line choice for those needing to cast long distances or who need lots of sensitivity to detect bites.
Monofilament fishing lines: diameter chartįishing Line Diameter Chart: Tabulated and Compared.Fishing Line Diameter Chart: Tabulated and Compared.
0 kommentar(er)
